Bringing you live news and features since 2013
Bringing you news, views and analysis since 2013
Survey

30105

Financial services firms update in-house technology on a reactive basis

RELATED TOPICS​

More than half (52 per cent) of senior decision-makers in financial services organisations across the US and Europe update or replace in-house solutions because they become technologically outdated. That’s according to a new in-depth study, commissioned by Asset Control.

Further underlining the ongoing need to adapt their in-house technology, 49 per cent of the sample said they were driven to schedule changes by ‘the increase in digitalisation within the business’ and 48 per cent by ‘the need to keep pace with the competition’.
 
All of this highlights the difficulties financial services firms face in implementing in-house systems. 94 per cent of respondents said they expected to encounter challenges of some sort when building a solution in-house.
 
These challenges often lead, directly or indirectly, to greater costs. ‘Skills/resourcing’ was the biggest challenge that respondents expected to encounter when building a solution in-house, highlighted by 62 per cent, followed by ‘staying within budget’, referenced by 60 per cent. Interestingly too, more than half the sample overall (54 per cent) cited ‘scope change: having to adapt the solution to meet changing regulations or business requirements’.
 
Martijn Groot, VP Marketing and Strategy, Asset Control, says: “The gradual accumulation of additional costs is one of the biggest problems with the in-house approach to technology development in financial services. Internal solutions are often approached as a project, i.e. a one-off cost and not regarded, and consequently budgeted, as an ongoing concern. This is unrealistic in a fast-changing financial services landscape.”
 
For many financial services organisations, the costs of internal solutions do ramp up. Nearly, three-quarters of the overall sample (73 per cent) reported that they had ‘experienced additional costs after implementing an internal solution’. The most common additional cost was ‘hiring new developers because of previous developers leaving the business’. This was referenced by 60 per cent of respondents in total.
 
“The one-off approach, if executed well, may look attractive given that the firm is best placed to cater to its own specific requirements,” Groot adds. “However, the subsequent maintenance costs to keep the lights on, and evolve the feature set to cope with emerging requirements, are large. Change is a given and any project scope is always shooting at a moving target. If their ROI horizon is only until go-live, the result will be a continuous ‘project mode’.”
 
“Also, with costing often done as a project,” Groot says, “some operational costs tend to be hidden until an organisation wants to change something. This can be a challenge, particularly if the original developers have moved on, the platform is technologically outdated or does not lend itself well to cloud deployment. Unfortunately, the true costs and constraints of an internally-developed solution often only become clear when firms need to change things.”
 

Latest News

Irish domiciled funds surpassed EUR4.3 trillion AuM (Assets under Management) at end-March 2024, a 15..
New analysis by London-based Nickel Digital Asset Management reveals 38 listed companies with a combined..
Bloomberg has announced that for the first time, its proprietary Bloomberg Second Measure (BSM) transaction..

Related Articles

Global ESG Investing
On May 15 Florida’s Republican Governor Ron DeSantis signed legislation that furthers his ongoing campaign to oppose the role of climate change and ESG factors in state policymaking...
On May 15 Florida’s Republican Governor Ron DeSantis signed legislation that furthers his ongoing campaign to oppose the role of..
Trends
The trend to buyout among the UK’s smaller defined benefit (DB) schemes continues with a slew of new sub GBP100 million deals announced this month alone...
The trend to buyout among the UK’s smaller defined benefit (DB) schemes continues with a slew of new sub GBP100..
Different flavours
In what is believed to be the first survey of its kind in the UK market, Nedgroup Investments, the investment-led, multi-boutique global asset manager with over USD20 billion under management, recently undertook a survey with 204 UK investment professionals, seeking insights into their perceptions and attitudes towards boutique asset managers...
In what is believed to be the first survey of its kind in the UK market, Nedgroup Investments, the investment-led,..
UK map
UK local government pension schemes (LGPS) are leading the charge on investment in private markets issuing tenders set to be worth billions of pounds in the coming years...
UK local government pension schemes (LGPS) are leading the charge on investment in private markets issuing tenders set to be..
Subscribe to the Institutional Asset Manager newsletter

Subscribe for access to our weekly newsletter, newsletter archive, updates on the site and exclusive email content.

Marketing by