Bringing you live news and features since 2013
Bringing you news, views and analysis since 2013
facebook logo

12662

SEC charges Nasdaq for failures during Facebook IPO

RELATED TOPICS​

The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged Nasdaq with securities laws violations resulting from its poor systems and decision-making during the initial public offering (IPO) and secondary market trading of Facebook shares.

 
Nasdaq has agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying a USD10m penalty – the largest ever against an exchange.
 
Exchanges have an obligation to ensure that their systems, processes, and contingency planning are robust and adequate to manage an IPO without disruption to the market. According to the SEC’s order instituting settled administrative proceedings, despite widespread anticipation that the Facebook IPO would be among the largest in history with huge numbers of investors participating, a design limitation in Nasdaq’s system to match IPO buy and sell orders caused disruptions to the Facebook IPO. Nasdaq then made a series of ill-fated decisions that led to the rules violations.
 
According to the SEC’s order, several members of Nasdaq’s senior leadership team convened a “Code Blue” conference call and decided not to delay the start of secondary market trading in Facebook with the expectation that they had fixed the system limitation by removing a few lines of computer code. However, they did not understand the root cause of the problem. Nasdaq’s decision to initiate trading before fully understanding the problem caused violations of several rules, including Nasdaq’s fundamental rule governing the price/time priority for executing trade orders. The problem caused more than 30,000 Facebook orders to remain stuck in Nasdaq’s system for more than two hours when they should have been promptly executed or cancelled.
 
“This action against Nasdaq tells the tale of how poorly designed systems and hasty decision-making not only disrupted one of the largest IPOs in history, but produced serious and pervasive violations of fundamental rules governing our markets,” says George S Canellos, co-director of the SEC’s division of enforcement.
 
Daniel M Hawke, chief of the SEC enforcement division’s market abuse unit, says: “Our focus in this investigation was on the design limitation in Nasdaq’s system and the exchange’s decision-making after that limitation came to light.  Too often in today’s markets, systems disruptions are written off as mere technical ‘glitches’ when it’s the design of the systems and the response of exchange officials that cause us the most concern.”
 
The matching of buy and sell orders in an IPO is referred to as "the cross." According to the SEC’s order, the systems problems encountered during the Facebook IPO on 18 May 2012 caused the cross to fall 19 minutes behind the orders received by Nasdaq, whose IPO cross application calculated the price and volume of the cross based on the orders and cancellations received up until 11:11 am This time discrepancy caused more than 38,000 marketable Facebook orders placed between 11:11 am and 11:30:09 am to not be included in the cross. Approximately 8,000 of those orders were entered into the market at 11:30 am when continuous trading commenced, and the remaining 30,000 were “stuck” orders. Immediately prior to the cross, Nasdaq officials noticed a discrepancy between the final indicative pricing and volume totals and the actual totals on Nasdaq’s internal systems. This discrepancy indicated that there was still a problem with the cross and that some cross-eligible orders may not have been handled properly. But Nasdaq failed to address this issue during the minutes and hours following the cross. Nasdaq’s Facebook issues also caused problems in the trading of Zynga shares, and Nasdaq failed to execute 365 orders for Zynga shares in accordance with the price/time priority requirements.
 
According to the SEC’s order, Nasdaq further violated its rules when it assumed a short position in Facebook of more than three million shares in an unauthorised error account. Nasdaq’s rules do not permit it to use an error account for any purpose. Nasdaq subsequently covered that short position for a profit of approximately USD10.8m, also in violation of its rules. Nasdaq further violated its rules in three other ways during the opening of trading after the end of the display-only period for Facebook and following a halt in Zynga trading.
 
The SEC’s order also charges Nasdaq’s affiliated third party broker-dealer, Nasdaq Execution Services (NES), with failing to maintain sufficient net capital reserves on the day of the Facebook IPO as a result of Nasdaq’s own Facebook trading through the unauthorised error account.

Latest News

RQI Investors, an Australian-based active quantitative equities manager and part of the First Sentier Investors..
UK-based wealth management companies London & Capital and Waverton have announced that they have reached..
Figment Europe, a provider of institutional staking infrastructure, writes that it is solidifying its presence..

Related Articles

British pound coin
Fixed income’s return to favour following widespread interest rate rises has led to investors overcrowding sterling investment grade credit, delegates at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association investment conference have heard...
Fixed income’s return to favour following widespread interest rate rises has led to investors overcrowding sterling investment grade credit, delegates..
Sustainable Economy Top Panel
Europe is driving the growth in sustainable investment with global assets under management in ESG-labelled funds passing USD2.8 trillion...
Europe is driving the growth in sustainable investment with global assets under management in ESG-labelled funds passing USD2.8 trillion...
Pension funds
UK institutional investors are questioning the value of investing in private markets despite pressure from government to finance the country’s net zero and levelling up ambitions...
UK institutional investors are questioning the value of investing in private markets despite pressure from government to finance the country’s..
Juan Nozal, Mapfre Asset Management
Juan Nozal, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager at MAPFRE Asset Management, talks about the outlook for fixed income assets over 2024, in what he predicts will be an outstanding year for this asset class...
Juan Nozal, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager at MAPFRE Asset Management, talks about the outlook for fixed income assets over 2024,..
Subscribe to the Institutional Asset Manager newsletter

Subscribe for access to our weekly newsletter, newsletter archive, updates on the site and exclusive email content.

Marketing by